Not sure I agree he's "that good." He's certainly very good but

in the games i've seen he's not absolutely blown me away.

I agree Grealish on form is very good and very natural talent.

i think Madders is up there with both of them though and in terms of raw talent (as opposed to pace/physical attributes) i think he's a better footballer than Sessegnon.

Posted By: Jim on May 15th 2018 at 13:30:51

Message Thread

FAO Jim RE: Sessegnon Vs Madders (NCFC) - Waz, May 15, 11:12:19
- Hey Waz, who's our unannounced signing then? (NCFC) - Dunney, May 15, 12:56:53
  - No idea (NCFC) - Waz, May 15, 13:27:52
    - I would. (NCFC) - BigGrantHolt, May 15, 17:17:53
- Not sure I’d agree with that... (NCFC) - loz, May 15, 11:17:39
  - Not sure I agree he's "that good." He's certainly very good but (NCFC) - Jim, May 15, 13:30:51
  - But not as a left back (NCFC) - trt354, May 15, 11:29:33
    - Cor. Imagine if he became an English Gareth bale. With (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, May 15, 12:09:06
      - Bale is very unlike Bale, unless he's having a Bale Day (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, May 15, 15:52:08
        
        Whereas Yakubu.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, May 15, 15:52:29
      - No actually meant Sessengon is a bit like Bale (NCFC) - trt354, May 15, 14:40:03
      - Think he means Wildschut was like Bale ... (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, May 15, 13:48:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.