Anyone still think 3 at the back is boring?
Some probably do, but it's preferable to this s**te.
Posted By: Common Sense Police on April 2nd 2018 at 16:43:25
Message Thread
- Anyone still think 3 at the back is boring? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 2, 16:43:25
- Don't understand why he changed it, possibly had an excuse on Fri, but not today. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Apr 2, 16:44:41
- Leaked loads of goals since going back to the four (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 2, 16:46:12
- I don't understand why we can't defend with 4 at the back! (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Apr 2, 16:45:19
- Full backs are mostly poor, Vrancic and Reed aren't good enough as a pair in front (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 2, 16:47:17
- Centre backs aren't quick either but I suppose that goes without saying (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 2, 16:47:48
- Full backs are mostly poor, Vrancic and Reed aren't good enough as a pair in front (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 2, 16:47:17
- Don't understand why he changed it, possibly had an excuse on Fri, but not today. (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Apr 2, 16:44:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.