Just seen the bench, no strikers at all ffs

how bad can a disciplinary problem be to leave yourself with one striker on the pitch and none on the bench?
Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face

Watkins isn't included for obvious reasons

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on March 6th 2018 at 20:43:27

Message Thread

Just seen the bench, no strikers at all ffs (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 6, 20:43:27
- Use Zimmerman in a Ginger Pele type striker role (Other Football) - Ken Breadstick, Mar 6, 20:53:39
  - I'd prefer that to Watkins tbf (n/m) (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 6, 20:55:45
  - Why not, put him up there and lump it to him. (n/m) (Other Football) - CROYDONCANARY, Mar 6, 20:55:06
- I would be tempted to bring on another winger and put Hernandez up front but (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Mar 6, 20:46:17
- Unfortunately the problem with Farke is he thinks Watkins is a forward (n/m) (Other Football) - roedtonowhere, Mar 6, 20:44:53
  - Watkins has a point to prove. Expecting him on at some stage in 2nd half (n/m) (Other Football) - derbyshire canary, Mar 6, 20:46:35
    - I'm not sure he's even had a shot this season has he? (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Mar 6, 20:47:29
      - Had a few good chances vs Fulham on opening day (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Mar 6, 20:51:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.