Signing Yanic really does represent a s**t bit of business by the club.

£7.5 mill I think? Serious money for us. Neil signed him, hardly played him, then got sacked and Farke (no blame attached here) doesn’t fancy him. I guess a loan is a way attempting to push his value up, but just a bit of a random signing in the first place for me.

Posted By: DH Yellow on January 11th 2018 at 13:03:41

Message Thread

Signing Yanic really does represent a shit bit of business by the club. (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Jan 11, 13:03:41
- See link in below thread fee was more like 4 million (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 11, 13:13:57
  - Still 3.99m too much (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 11, 13:24:22
  - Fair enough, makes it easier to recoup that money then obviously (n/m) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Jan 11, 13:19:50
- For the millionth time, he didn't cost £7.5m (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 11, 13:13:35
- Pravda Un will soon be telling us we only paid 20p and a packet of Trebors for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 11, 13:04:57
  - Still would have been a waste! (n/m) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Jan 11, 13:06:50
    - Twetty pee would be alright but I'm keeping the Trebors (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 11, 13:24:55

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.