Tell that to Sheff wendies....
Posted By: promethian1 on January 1st 2018 at 17:02:43
Message Thread
- Farke's Risk pays off..... but it was close......... (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Jan 1, 17:01:26
- it didn't cos 2 points dropped v Burton (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:02:04
- did we start the game with 3 points? Where we ahead and then conceeded a equaliser? (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 1, 17:18:03
- *were *an (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 1, 17:19:35
- Farke didn't select the best team to get a win v Burton (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:28:21
- agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 1, 18:24:17
- Farke didn't select the best team to get a win v Burton (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:28:21
- *were *an (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 1, 17:19:35
- Tell that to Sheff wendies.... (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Jan 1, 17:02:43
- it was 2 points dropped though cos Farke didn't select the best team (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:04:05
- possibly... but we gained 4... but could have dropped 6... (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Jan 1, 17:06:08
- it was 2 points dropped though cos Farke didn't select the best team (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:04:05
- did we start the game with 3 points? Where we ahead and then conceeded a equaliser? (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Jan 1, 17:18:03
- it didn't cos 2 points dropped v Burton (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 1, 17:02:04
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.