Still think we could have pushed the boat and got a loan striker to cover us

That's just bad planning on the part of Webber and Farke.

Farke stated in August he saw Watkins as a striker, it was really disappointing to hear that.

Posted By: roedtonowhere on October 31st 2017 at 22:21:24

Message Thread

Few brief observations (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Oct 31, 22:14:11
- Still think we could have pushed the boat and got a loan striker to cover us (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Oct 31, 22:21:24
  - Which was amazing cos Watkins hadn't b4 played as a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Oct 31, 22:30:28
- Our parachute payments are parachute payments (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:19:12
  - Meaning we had Premiership players .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Oct 31, 22:25:02
    - Erm... We had / have players paid Premier league salaries (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:26:36
      - No sorry I don’t .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Oct 31, 22:32:26
        
        think the problem is just that most of the players we signed with our (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 31, 22:38:56
        
        Exactly. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:40:12
        
        The point of parachute payments is not to allow us to buy more players (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:35:33
        
        And you're comparing players we bought in the Prem two years afo (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:38:05
  - Funny how people say (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 31, 22:23:14
    - Well surely they're similarly misinformed then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 31, 22:24:50
- Agree with 1-5 but Parachute payments mean fuck when your squad is so overpaid.. (NCFC) - lurd, Oct 31, 22:17:29
  - Agree to a certain extent .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Oct 31, 22:27:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.