the confusion is caused by people being wilfully dense

or unwilfully in some cases.

It's not elegant drafting by any means but you probably need that additional wording in some form to avoid legitimising a wrongful 4th sub in normal time (ie if a 4th sub did somehow get made in the first 90, it would only be against the rules if the match didn't then go to extra time)

Posted By: CWC on October 25th 2017 at 10:56:39

Message Thread

So the refs fucked us a third time.... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 25, 02:32:05
- I think 4 if you count Iwobi hurling Reed to the floor (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 25, 07:40:42
- think this is a non story (NCFC) - matt in london, Oct 25, 07:18:28
  - I agree. It would be different if you were only able to make your three normal (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 25, 07:53:18
    - I guess not because he scored the equaliser in normal time (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 25, 07:54:25
      - I groaned when we 'who?'ed him as he came on (NCFC) - matt in london, Oct 25, 08:34:17
        
        Classic not picking up the new guy. I do feel we have looked a bit (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 25, 08:38:51
  - Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 25, 07:49:21
  - Yeah, that's how I read it (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 25, 07:23:18
    - exactly (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 25, 08:40:15
      - the wording is a bit sloppy (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 25, 09:01:17
        
        the confusion is caused by people being wilfully dense (NCFC) - CWC, Oct 25, 10:56:39
    - Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 25, 07:47:34
- Not really clear is it (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 25, 07:00:17
- It will be ignored as will the referees performance (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 25, 03:11:15
- I don’t have enough energy for a replay. (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Oct 25, 02:36:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.