No Wes, Madders or Tetts then

Posted By: Azteca on September 23rd 2017 at 14:01:26

Message Thread

Team news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Sep 23, 14:00:17
- Is that 4-4-2? (n/m) (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Sep 23, 14:09:47
  - 4-3-3/4-5-1 surely? (NCFC) - bjg123, Sep 23, 14:20:28
- Ze Tinkerman (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Sep 23, 14:04:01
- No Wes, Madders or Tetts then (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 23, 14:01:26
  - Will be interesting to see how the reed / trybull combo works compared to tettey (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Sep 23, 14:05:08
    - Same (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 23, 14:14:04
- Subs... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Sep 23, 14:00:39
  - Hmmm. I think at home you need at least one of Wes or Madders. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 23, 14:04:21
  - Not massively happy with that (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 23, 14:02:17
    - I'm still not sure about Farke's team selections. I think the Norwich would have got more (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 23, 14:17:52
      - Tough in the champs though. Ludser games and we are on a cup run too. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 23, 14:28:43
    - Agreed (NCFC) - paulg, Sep 23, 14:12:13
    - Little surprised no Wes or Wildshuct (n/m) (NCFC) - WalksietheReturn, Sep 23, 14:10:34
    - Think wildschut suits us away when counter attacking ... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 23, 14:08:07
    - Interesting that he’s gone for Watkins over Wildshut (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Sep 23, 14:04:57
      - If however we do win with this line up then bodes very well as (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 23, 14:05:44
        
        Not only that, it would show that we have squad strength (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 23, 14:26:08
        
        Eggs actlee (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Sep 23, 14:20:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.