No protection in front of back four tho. Tettey and Reed should have screened to back four
Feel it's a bit harsh to single out the two CB's when the midfield includes Naismith.
Posted By: roedtonowhere on August 19th 2017 at 18:04:36
Message Thread
- Based on those highlights, it's got fuck all to do with the style, its the defending (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Aug 19, 17:59:01
- We've not marked properly for two years. What I find baffling though (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 18:10:55
- perhaps the fact it's largely different players and manager (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 19, 18:29:45
- Wes and Maddison not starting just as bad. Shocking selection all round (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 18:31:11
- yes, agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 19, 18:36:53
- Wes and Maddison not starting just as bad. Shocking selection all round (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 18:31:11
- It's an art apparently! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 19, 18:22:45
- perhaps the fact it's largely different players and manager (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 19, 18:29:45
- Yep, same as Sunderland. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 19, 18:04:59
- No protection in front of back four tho. Tettey and Reed should have screened to back four (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Aug 19, 18:04:36
- You could be talking about any of the last 3 seasons there (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Aug 19, 18:01:27
- Webber saw this last year they've done nothing to rectify the (NCFC) - Mackem Canary, Aug 19, 18:04:06
- Sad to say, that's completely spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Aug 19, 18:02:29
- We've not marked properly for two years. What I find baffling though (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 19, 18:10:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.