presume most of the FBs can play as one of the 3 CBs if we are going with wing backs - Wrath of the Barclay

presume most of the FBs can play as one of the 3 CBs if we are going with wing backs

with wide midfielders as the wing backs.

3 at the back with wing backs actually requires less out and out defenders than a standard back 4

Posted By: mr carra on August 4th 2017 at 11:21:24

Message Thread

Webber seemed to suggest 2 midfielders last night ... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 10:42:33
- I actually think we're shorter in CM than anywhere else (NCFC) - Waz, Aug 4, 11:26:02
- presume most of the FBs can play as one of the 3 CBs if we are going with wing backs (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 4, 11:21:24
  - I recognise all of these words individually, but I'm really not comprehending this msg (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 4, 11:23:23
- Webbers been lusting after a certain centre mid all week. Should be done Tuesday (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 4, 11:18:51
- Agreed. Esp if going to play 3 at the back. I'd like at least one more defender (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 4, 11:15:49
  - Not sure about Pinto and I wouldn't class Wildschut as a FB (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 4, 11:28:48
    - Arsenal are reknowned for giving up soft goals though (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 4, 11:37:38
      - We'd have still have two big CBs though, so no different from a flat back 4? (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 4, 11:42:11
    - oops, should be a response to MIKE above (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 4, 11:29:26
- Trybull probably one of them cf. Waz yesterday evening (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Aug 4, 10:52:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.