He never looked arsed in my opinion, he thought he was better than
He actually was.
Posted By: strap_on sally on July 25th 2017 at 22:05:41
Message Thread
- Look weaker without reed (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jul 25, 21:25:41
- You have a bit of an anti Tettey agenda don't you Loz? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jul 25, 21:31:43
- Apparently the weakness was down our right side (Watkins). (n/m) (NCFC) - dennis moore, Jul 25, 21:36:49
- The other day Watkins played with 12 on his back and reminded (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 25, 21:52:37
- Pilkington was decent when fit & could be arsed (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Jul 25, 21:54:11
- He never looked arsed in my opinion, he thought he was better than (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 25, 22:05:41
- tiny little window, that was. One game, maybe two. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jul 25, 22:03:58
- Pilkington was decent when fit & could be arsed (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Jul 25, 21:54:11
- The other day Watkins played with 12 on his back and reminded (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Jul 25, 21:52:37
- No agenda just think we've missed read (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jul 25, 21:35:57
- Apparently the weakness was down our right side (Watkins). (n/m) (NCFC) - dennis moore, Jul 25, 21:36:49
- Agreed... and Madders distribution (n/m) (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Jul 25, 21:30:09
- You have a bit of an anti Tettey agenda don't you Loz? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jul 25, 21:31:43
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.