rich foreign ownership is no different to rich domestic ownership

some will be in for the right reasons, some will be in it for the wrong reasons

regardless of which applies, some will be an epic success, some will be an epic fail, and most will be somewhere in the middle with an end result that's no different to a non-bankrolled club.

Posted By: CWC on July 18th 2017 at 15:38:12

Message Thread

FAO Gob on a Stick (Other Football) - Knitted Jesus, Jul 18, 14:22:01
- Chairs ... looks like they sold to Chinese at end of season (Other Football) - Gob on a Stick, Jul 18, 14:25:13
  - Ah yes. There is a lot of new Chinese ownership in the English game (Other Football) - Knitted Jesus, Jul 18, 14:32:35
    - I still say the philosophy of foreign ownership isn't fatally flawed (Other Football) - Gob on a Stick, Jul 18, 14:38:14
      - rich foreign ownership is no different to rich domestic ownership (Other Football) - CWC, Jul 18, 15:38:12
      - Who? Apart from Southampton? (Who are for sale)? (Other Football) - Knitted Jesus, Jul 18, 14:53:35
        
        Loads .. Leicester as Lurd points out .. Chelsea in early days (Other Football) - Gob on a Stick, Jul 18, 15:55:53
        
        Chelsea were in the Champions League when Roman took them over (n/m) (Other Football) - Ralf Scrampton, Jul 18, 16:11:13
        
        My bad ... memory not what it was (n/m) (Other Football) - Gob on a Stick, Jul 18, 17:32:13
        
        Err Leicester? (n/m) (Other Football) - lurd, Jul 18, 15:27:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.