which again gives a misleading picture dunt it? anyway your last 2 words were 'economic gr

owth' which is what my point was following on directly from.

it's also clear that's what i was talking about when i said 'most of that economic growth'

but still, details...

:-)

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton on May 25th 2017 at 21:59:56

Message Thread

FAO Larrald re Corporation Tax........ (General Chat) - Kirrie, May 25, 16:20:14
- Well.................................... ..... (General Chat) - Larry Hagman, May 25, 20:51:20
- Er.... (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 25, 16:34:50
  - Economic growth encouraged (in part) by lower corporation tax rates (General Chat) - Jim, May 25, 17:22:27
  - (Of course, someone on your wing of politics (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 25, 16:45:25
    - Ah see this is WW2 as you have summarised the same argument above (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, May 25, 17:23:26
      - Sorry meant see my comment above is WW2 (n/m) (General Chat) - Jim, May 25, 17:23:50
  - details... (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 25, 16:42:36
    - That's not quite true (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 25, 16:57:33
      - why would i not be adjusting for inflation when trying to compare across years? (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 25, 17:31:54
        
        because we were talking about the tax base (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 25, 18:08:24
        
        which again gives a misleading picture dunt it? anyway your last 2 words were 'economic gr (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 25, 21:59:56
        
        Details (General Chat) - Old Git, May 25, 18:26:11
        
        it is isn't it? (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 25, 22:01:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.