Weak - no real insight
Strangely fails to compare Ipswich's winning formula - neat passing honed from an early aged - against our own disjointed & heavily reliant on long balls tactics. Instead sidestepping the issue and making vague reference to the miriad (but not examined) options available to Worthy and how fascinating the experimentation will be as the season stumbles on.
While I'd have loved to have seen some passion against Ips**te (although, to be honest, not the type evinced by Fleming - he was generally poor and that tackle would have made Souness blush), I'm with Rehman on this one, especially as he appears to have been asked about HIS debut, not about the derby per se.
Posted By: BerlinCanary on February 8th 2006 at 23:09:57
Message Thread
- New Wankhorn piece on the Pink 'Un, might be WWII? (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Feb 8, 22:41:44
- Weak - no real insight (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Feb 8, 23:09:57
- The most worrying thing about his latest piece is the August 2006 comment (NCFC) - Army Boy, Feb 8, 22:51:23
- and he still wont have a twating clue (NCFC) - dear prudence, Feb 8, 23:02:10
- lets hope he is there... (NCFC) - we beat the scum 2 1, Feb 8, 22:56:41
- You're best off giving up mate (NCFC) - theguru, Feb 8, 23:00:32
- He wouldn't know if he wasn't (NCFC) - theguru, Feb 8, 22:52:36
- I think that's a decent piece actually (n/m) (NCFC) - theguru, Feb 8, 22:48:58
- apart from (NCFC) - Dave in France, Feb 8, 23:21:45
- ok but still doesnt mention Green hoofs every ball (n/m) (NCFC) - dear prudence, Feb 8, 22:53:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.