Where was the need for stability then?
Walker had a season in which he'd had enormous personal issues, but it seemed to me at the time that he was beginning to turn it around and I was hopeful for the future.
Why the double standards from the board now? I can't work that one out.
Posted By: NJ_Canary on February 7th 2006 at 20:48:37
Message Thread
- Came across this little summary of the departure of Mike Walker (second time) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 7, 20:22:35
- MW was as good as sacked (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 7, 21:29:55
- Where was the need for stability then? (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Feb 7, 20:48:37
- Was he not (NCFC) - Groningen Canary, Feb 7, 20:25:22
- The board of course could always argue that Forest... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 7, 20:25:19
- That was after back to back (NCFC) - Citizen Creosote, Feb 7, 20:24:28
- 5 efforts!! A couple would be a start. (n/m) (NCFC) - Swanny, Feb 7, 21:07:21
- and from a ropey memory a dismal 2-0 defeat at Stoke inbetween? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Feb 7, 20:34:21
- With lots of nasty Stoke fans hanging around the away end, (NCFC) - Superstar D J, Feb 7, 20:38:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.