That table down there vvvv that has us third if matches were only 80 minutes...

We'd only be 5 points better off. Those 5 points come from only 2 games, both against Newcastle; we'd have won both. I'm not sure only two games from 33 is really much argument for lacking fitness, both times against the top team in the league. (We did concede a late goal against Leeds but then we had also just scored a late equaliser in that game anyway, so were losing on 80".)

More interesting to me is that teams in the play off positions *have* picked up points (Leeds are level) in the last 10 minutes. Reading and Huddersfield have got 13 (!) points (EACH FFS!) more in the last 10 minutes and Wednesday have a few as well.

Posted By: APB on February 22nd 2017 at 18:21:44

Message Thread

That table down there vvvv that has us third if matches were only 80 minutes... (NCFC) - APB, Feb 22, 18:21:44
- 80 minutes is a random cut-off. To me, in a lot of home games, particularly when we've had (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 22, 23:22:58
- Definitely been noticeable how those teams have been scoring late goals (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 22, 19:00:08
- The 80 min thing hasn't defined our season .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Feb 22, 18:53:31
  - Definitely. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Feb 22, 19:05:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.