I don't think we want to sell him per se
But rather we need to sell to buy and he's someone that others are actually interested in whereas the ones we would actually want to shift are unshiftable.
How many other players that aren't really in the first team would actually yield a fee and wouldn't require us to pay off?
Posted By: SimonOTBC on January 10th 2017 at 18:31:15
Message Thread
- Canos linked to appearance fees... rumour from that unknown chap (NCFC) - forzancfc, Jan 10, 17:40:05
- I liked Jafski's reply. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 10, 21:20:41
- I flung you another emither mate, did you get it? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 10, 21:47:02
- Well that would be bollocks (NCFC) - inutero, Jan 10, 18:45:29
- I don't think we want to sell him per se (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 10, 18:31:15
- Well that's definitely shit then, he hasn't played has he (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 10, 18:20:13
- "Appearance fees' is becoming the new "Wages?". :O) (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jan 10, 17:46:38
- I liked Jafski's reply. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 10, 21:20:41
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.