I just feel that it 'can' lead to a succession of knee-jerk reactionary appointments

Absolutely if it's clear that someone isn't up to it, they have to go. But to what end? Maybe we find 'the one' and maybe they're a complete failure. We thought AN was 'the one' but he's as fallible as anyone else.

Our most successful appointments (arguably) have been Walker and Lambert and they had no real track record but did a great job. On that premise we may as well go for anyone from Colchester, but that would appear to be mad.

I think he'll go but I won't be surprised if it leads to further woe. More than happy and really hope I'm proved wrong.

Posted By: Worthing Yellow on December 27th 2016 at 00:47:57

Message Thread

Thanks for nothing Santa! (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Dec 27, 00:18:30
- Great to know you're not a fan of sacking managers (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 27, 00:19:34
  - York won 2 out the last 3 now. Unbeaten in 3. (NCFC) - pants, Dec 27, 00:27:26
  - I never understand that statement, if a manager is shit, I am a huge fan of sacking (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 27, 00:21:45
    - I just feel that it 'can' lead to a succession of knee-jerk reactionary appointments (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Dec 27, 00:47:57
    - We'll then you're a fan of sacking shit managers (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 27, 00:30:22
      - iPhone fail (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 27, 00:31:54
        
        yeah, having one to start with is a terrible misjudgement (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 27, 00:39:20
        
        Now, play nicely Samuel, or not at all. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Dec 27, 00:47:22
        
        Those aren't the only 2 options, this is wotb (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 27, 00:51:47
      - apostrophe fail (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 27, 00:31:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.