Not as strange as starting josh M wide left...

He's on record saying Brady At lb his best position. Murphy was terrible in the week yet rewarded with a start.

Brady a more than capable LM so would have been a more natural for without question

Posted By: loz on December 10th 2016 at 16:21:20

Message Thread

Starting Brady at left back ahead of Olsson was a strange decision (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 16:19:48
- In theory should be great away from home (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 10, 16:28:05
  - Yes i think in theory having all those pacey players in the team could be dangerous (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 16:31:59
    - so it was logical except with hindsight when it becomes strange? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 10, 16:41:14
      - I was referring to playing the two Murphs, not selecting Brady ahead of Olsson at left (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 16:45:21
        
        so he should've tinkered with a backline that finally kept a clean sheet last time (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 10, 16:53:23
- Part of the reason we went down last year IMO. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Dec 10, 16:22:48
- It was a stupid decision Jim as was playing both Murphy's instead of Mulumbu (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 10, 16:21:47
  - I think if you want to play both Murphy's then you need either (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 16:26:25
- it wasn't that strange surely (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 10, 16:21:31
  - Didn't AN say that Olsson was the best LB in the Championship after he signed contract? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Dec 10, 16:22:10
- Not as strange as starting josh M wide left... (NCFC) - loz, Dec 10, 16:21:20
  - I could at least see the logic of playing pace out wide if we wanted to play (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 16:24:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.