Pro's - suits Wes best playing behind 2x strikers

Con's - We don't really have the midfielders for it, especially on the right, and only Brady who could do that shuttling job on the left, and he's a mess at the moment. Also our fullbacks would be more exposed and Neil would have to play one of Naismith, Oliveira and Lafferty up front with Jerome which goes against his philosophy, and means we wasted £14m on Prtichard, Canos and Maddison to play backup to Wes, and I don't see where the Murphy twins fit in a diamond (given they don't track back so good) 2x more for the Wes Role?

Posted By: MIKEWALKER on November 7th 2016 at 08:36:25

Message Thread

Let's go back to the diamond formation (n/m) (NCFC) - Highway, Nov 7, 08:27:32
- Yeah, OK (NCFC) - Old Man, Nov 7, 08:37:15
  - Wolverhampton would be easier to get to to see a diamond formation (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Nov 7, 10:00:09
  - Earths mantle it is (n/m) (NCFC) - Highway, Nov 7, 08:51:03
- Pro's - suits Wes best playing behind 2x strikers (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Nov 7, 08:36:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.