Actually I think he probably would. But he probably wouldn't have made the

disastrous first touch. Well, not on this particular occasion.

It's interesting. That goal should have been disallowed - it was a blatant foul. But everybody is happy with it, because it's seen as just punishment for the awful clumsiness.
Touching, really, that we still like to believe in justice.

Posted By: dennis moore on November 5th 2016 at 09:00:12

Message Thread

Today's XI? (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Nov 5, 07:38:33
- That midfield makes me nervous (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 5, 10:57:19
- He will stick by McGovern for at least one more game (n/m) (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Nov 5, 07:44:45
  - he'd better not (n/m) (NCFC) - dr fanta, Nov 5, 08:02:05
    - is unfair to drop McG after only one bad game (NCFC) - pab, Nov 5, 08:20:55
      - would be pretty depressing for Ruddy to see that and stay on the bench (NCFC) - dr fanta, Nov 5, 08:23:55
        
        I was there too. Don't think Ruddy would have done betters (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Nov 5, 08:31:41
        
        really??? goals 1, 3 & 4? (n/m) (NCFC) - dr fanta, Nov 5, 08:49:43
        
        do you think Glenn Murray would or could have (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 5, 08:35:15
        
        remember reading at home a couple of seasons ago? (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Nov 5, 12:32:02
        
        Actually I think he probably would. But he probably wouldn't have made the (NCFC) - dennis moore, Nov 5, 09:00:12
        
        no it wasn't a foul (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 5, 09:04:30
        
        No but he could have rolled about 5 under him (n/m) (NCFC) - CauldRon, Nov 5, 08:47:19
  - Can we play McG AND Ruddy? X (n/m) (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Nov 5, 07:47:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.