Assuming it's 442 he doesn't really fit.

4411 and he's in with Ashton for me Clive.

Posted By: avenging canary on October 27th 2016 at 13:28:36

Message Thread

Just caught up with this. So you guys have decided Fox was better than Wes. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 27, 12:42:03
- Can Wes play in the same team as Hucks and Peters? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Oct 27, 13:54:46
  - Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - berstreetsfinest, Oct 27, 17:44:48
- Fox was a wonder. Wessi isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Oct 27, 13:51:35
  - *winger* ffs (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Oct 27, 18:09:57
- Fox at his best far better than Wes at his best (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 27, 13:44:13
- Assuming it's 442 he doesn't really fit. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 27, 13:28:36
- Wes needs to be rested though, he's getting on a bit now (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 27, 13:16:16
- Wes not making an all time team is seething me right off (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Oct 27, 13:00:21
- Not as skilful but more effective. (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 12:47:40
  - When they were in basket case mode...so they are not now then ?!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 27, 12:49:05
    - Yes they are (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 12:54:12
- Different positions. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Oct 27, 12:42:35
  - Obviously. But you've put Fox in all-time midfield, and not Wes. No. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 27, 12:43:34
    - Wes can't play in an All-Time Fantsay XI twice a week. Everyone knows this. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Oct 27, 13:07:59
    - No diamond, no Wes. (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Oct 27, 12:58:32
    - Perhaps we should do an all time 4-4-2, all time 4-3-3 etc (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Oct 27, 12:46:13
    - Dunt blah. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Oct 27, 12:44:24

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.