6 minutes seemed a bit much.
In theory you should add more during stoppage time for any more breaks, hence the "minimum" stipulation, but the number of times I've seen games finish to the second of the added time despite goals and substitutions makes me think most refs choose to make it optional.
Posted By: APB on September 29th 2016 at 16:37:47
Message Thread
- Cold light of day and wife's match summary (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Sep 29, 16:09:55
- having watched the highlights (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 17:02:24
- The 'eek' count in CoD was high which tells a story I think. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Sep 29, 19:53:09
- indeed, we certainly seemed under the cosh there, not very encouraging (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 21:16:45
- The 'eek' count in CoD was high which tells a story I think. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Sep 29, 19:53:09
- 6 minutes seemed a bit much. (NCFC) - APB, Sep 29, 16:37:47
- Having reffed for 10 years at senior level... (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Sep 29, 16:49:46
- having watched the highlights (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Sep 29, 17:02:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.