Yes I would, especially with the manner in which we've gone
About our business. I wanted Brady to be gone early like we did Redmond to free up funds for the better quality we needed in certain areas especially strikers.
I think that we've now got a massive imbalance in the squad we've got so many players to occupy few places with absolutely no way to fit even half of them in. The Murphys, Brady, canos, Jarvis, Prichard, hoolahan, Maddison, Naismith howson. But only two strikers assuming that lafferty goes. It's nice to have options but we spent the bulk of our transfer money on a position that barely needed strengthening. Last time round as has been stated we had grabban jerome hooper lafferty and the bonus of johnsons goals, I think we were in a much better shape last time, that's without the fact that villa and Newcastle are spending money like water to buy promotion.
Posted By: Mickdundee on August 30th 2016 at 17:56:59
Message Thread
- So is the general consensus that our business is done? (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:29:52
- No way (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 30, 17:45:44
- By business I mean selling as well. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:47:13
- Still no need a striker and centre back (n/m) (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 30, 18:11:03
- By business I mean selling as well. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:47:13
- The media would have us believe that we are still in for any or all of the following (NCFC) - Highlander, Aug 30, 17:43:23
- Id take all 6. (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris, Aug 30, 17:53:34
- But you probably went to public school... (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:57:13
- Diuretic Mbokani - i nominate this post for Typo of the Year (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Aug 30, 17:46:55
- Seconded (n/m) (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 30, 18:11:55
- Sorry (NCFC) - Highlander, Aug 30, 17:59:37
- I thought he was just being clever. I liked it. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:53:15
- Id take all 6. (n/m) (NCFC) - Boris, Aug 30, 17:53:34
- You've got to be kidding, not too unhappy? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Aug 30, 17:34:15
- You would be unhappy? (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:38:43
- Yes I would, especially with the manner in which we've gone (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Aug 30, 17:56:59
- If Laffers leaves and nobody else arrives. Loads will be unhappy (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Aug 30, 17:46:11
- We have TWO strikers (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:44:30
- You would be unhappy? (NCFC) - avenging canary, Aug 30, 17:38:43
- Would be utterly amazed if it was (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:32:45
- I think we're trying to get things done still, but it may or may not happen (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 30, 17:32:17
- Most likely, but something could always happen late on (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 30, 17:31:46
- Don't see how we will be ok with TWO strikers (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:34:19
- Neither do I (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 30, 17:34:54
- And if we fail with permanent transfers (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:37:06
- No Prem team has gone for MBok (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 30, 17:38:02
- And if we fail with permanent transfers (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:37:06
- Neither do I (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 30, 17:34:54
- Don't see how we will be ok with TWO strikers (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 30, 17:34:19
- No way (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 30, 17:45:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.