I know. And with Murph and Canos that wouldn't look half so narrow as last week. - Wrath of the Barclay

I know. And with Murph and Canos that wouldn't look half so narrow as last week.

Semicolons led me to think 4-1-4-1 though. Overinterpreting punctuation is one of my many weaknesses :)

Posted By: Old Man on August 27th 2016 at 14:07:04

Message Thread

Team news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Aug 27, 14:00:12
- 4-1-4-1, or Howson sitting back with Tettey? (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 27, 14:04:43
  - It's always 4-2-3-1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 27, 14:06:00
    - I know. And with Murph and Canos that wouldn't look half so narrow as last week. (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 27, 14:07:04
      - Yes, but more pace and width in the three but will Naismith hold the ball up enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 27, 14:07:43
- System (NCFC) - Jack Flash, Aug 27, 14:04:32
- We need a striker (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 27, 14:01:25
- subs,, (NCFC) - DrDublin, Aug 27, 14:01:05
  - Even with no Cameron (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 27, 14:03:46
    - Here's what i dont get.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 27, 14:07:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.