Alright well even without him if you take the first choice front 3
which would be Hucks, JJ, Mcveigh then there is no target man there. plenty of pace and skill but no physical presence.
Posted By: Jim on January 31st 2006 at 15:19:54
Message Thread
- If these rumours are true will we have to change our style of play? (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 31, 15:08:52
- Earnshaw isn't signing, it's a wind-up (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow Jersey, Jan 31, 15:09:39
- Alright well even without him if you take the first choice front 3 (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 31, 15:19:54
- That doesn't mean we'll start passing again! (NCFC) - Yellow Jersey, Jan 31, 15:25:06
- Smells of a wind-up to me (n/m) (NCFC) - Small, Jan 31, 15:10:54
- Arizona Bay (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 31, 15:11:13
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Small, Jan 31, 15:12:38
- That's where you're supposed to do your by-now customary opening gambit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 31, 15:14:20
- Oh shit! Sorry (NCFC) - Small, Jan 31, 15:15:41
- That's where you're supposed to do your by-now customary opening gambit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 31, 15:14:20
- ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Small, Jan 31, 15:12:38
- Arizona Bay (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 31, 15:11:13
- Alright well even without him if you take the first choice front 3 (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 31, 15:19:54
- Earnshaw isn't signing, it's a wind-up (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellow Jersey, Jan 31, 15:09:39
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.