Thought he was treated harshly after Luton

No worse than anyone else on the pitch that day, he was criminally underused by Hughton. The irony as well is that I think he'd have suited Hughton's team, someone who can play a long ball with a bit of accuracy might have improved our attack no end.

Posted By: bjg123 on August 9th 2016 at 10:26:23

Message Thread

Remember when David Fox was the answer? Then we got burst by Luton and he deactivated. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 9, 10:17:57
- Nope (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 9, 10:32:14
  - You're wrong about everything, CB41 (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 9, 11:19:35
    - I'm always right about what I can't remember (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 9, 12:08:00
- Thought he was treated harshly after Luton (NCFC) - bjg123, Aug 9, 10:26:23
  - Ran the show against us in the 1-7, him and that weird blonde weasel (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 9, 10:28:34
    - He ran the show consistently for us in the champ winning team (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 9, 11:03:56
      - remember he did poorly in the 0-3 v Liverpool and never really figured again. Shame. (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Aug 9, 11:17:21
    - That albino midget still gives me nightmares. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Aug 9, 10:32:04
    - Perkins. The whole Colchester team were like giants that day. (NCFC) - APB, Aug 9, 10:30:55
      - Magnus. (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Aug 9, 10:34:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.