I guess we probably couldn't sign him and McCormack
and mccormack was first choice so our hands were tied until it became clear that wasn't going to happen.
Posted By: SimonOTBC on August 4th 2016 at 19:33:16
Message Thread
- Brighton missed out on Pritchard because he got stuck in... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 19:25:13
- I guess we probably couldn't sign him and McCormack (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 4, 19:33:16
- Ones a striker though one isn't odd strategy (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 19:33:47
- Indeed. Cost, need and talent will always need to be balanced. (NCFC) - King, Aug 4, 19:53:38
- (Supposed to be a reply to Simon) (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Aug 4, 19:54:10
- It's more about deployment of our cash isn't it? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 4, 19:41:54
- But we still need 2 X strikers and presumably... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 19:56:24
- if you consider that Pritchard replaces Brady then we still have plenty to spray around (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 4, 20:00:16
- But we still need 2 X strikers and presumably... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 19:56:24
- Indeed. Cost, need and talent will always need to be balanced. (NCFC) - King, Aug 4, 19:53:38
- Ones a striker though one isn't odd strategy (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 19:33:47
- I guess we probably couldn't sign him and McCormack (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 4, 19:33:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.