Or.. we had a set amount and were gong to spunk most on McCormack
That didn't come off we can buy Prits but spend less on a forward.
Posted By: harry boulders on August 3rd 2016 at 11:28:13
Message Thread
- If true seems a replacement for Brady when he leaves (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 3, 11:24:56
- You talking about Pritchard? He's a number 10. Don't think I've ever seen him play left (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 3, 11:43:03
- Also adept at playing left midfield ... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 3, 11:46:41
- Pritchard isn't a winger (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 3, 11:30:47
- Since when has that stopped us... (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 3, 11:44:35
- Not an out an out winger no but a wide player ... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 3, 11:32:19
- Or.. we had a set amount and were gong to spunk most on McCormack (NCFC) - harry boulders, Aug 3, 11:28:13
- You talking about Pritchard? He's a number 10. Don't think I've ever seen him play left (NCFC) - thirsty work, Aug 3, 11:43:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.