Waghorn wrote his article to provoke a reaction...
He seems to have succeeded; I've no idea what he hopes to prove though.
Posted By: Ben on January 28th 2006 at 22:50:56
Message Thread
- This whole Waghorn thing... (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 28, 22:22:24
- I've re-read it several times now (NCFC) - Occams_Razor, Jan 28, 22:34:09
- I agree. Sorry to say... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 28, 22:40:57
- Waghorn wrote his article to provoke a reaction... (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 28, 22:50:56
- pi$$ off people who buy the paper that keeps him employed? (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 29, 00:20:36
- As I said, I think he's proved it. (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 28, 22:53:22
- But half of the responses have been perfectly reasonable (n/m) (NCFC) - Knee Jerk Reaction, Jan 29, 00:03:30
- What does he hope to prove though? (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 28, 22:57:55
- I think it's more of a suggestion... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 28, 23:01:32
- That's what I thinkt as well (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 28, 23:03:12
- I think it's more of a suggestion... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 28, 23:01:32
- Waghorn wrote his article to provoke a reaction... (NCFC) - Ben, Jan 28, 22:50:56
- I agree. Sorry to say... (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 28, 22:40:57
- glad it's not just me (NCFC) - megson, Jan 28, 22:32:36
- It's the same old argument isn't it...? (NCFC) - Knee Jerk Reaction, Jan 28, 22:43:57
- Indeed (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 28, 22:46:33
- post of the day (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 28, 23:31:57
- Indeed (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 28, 22:46:33
- It's the same old argument isn't it...? (NCFC) - Knee Jerk Reaction, Jan 28, 22:43:57
- I've re-read it several times now (NCFC) - Occams_Razor, Jan 28, 22:34:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.