Re the number of players used this season.

This is where the club have failed the most. We actually have a very big squad but we simply have too many players on good money who have contributed almost nothing to the season.

Mulumbu, Dorrans and Vadis must be earning ?60k a week between them. Why not spent ?40k on some genuine class and the rest on a GON type?

Then you have the likes of Whittaker and Lafferty who've barely played yet we've struggled to offload - presumably because they are on too high a salary.

Then you have all the young lads on loan - how many of these will ever make a career of it at Norwich?

Posted By: lurd on May 3rd 2016 at 19:30:48

Message Thread

Re the number of players used this season. (NCFC) - lurd, May 3, 19:30:48
- You didn't see this? You'd better sit down (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 3, 19:42:34
  - Ok so if Mulumbu is what ?40k gets you, we're better off getting unproven hungry talent in (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, May 3, 20:15:35
  - If those figures are true, that's actually quite sensible spendin (NCFC) - pants, May 3, 19:51:51
    - How does the Daily Tits get hold of that kind of info? (NCFC) - emmaroyds, May 3, 19:59:57
      - *according to Football Manager 2016 (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 3, 20:01:54
        
        Oh well it must be true then. (NCFC) - emmaroyds, May 3, 20:11:01
        
        Yep, some internationals in there too that I would expect to be higher paid. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 3, 20:21:36
        
        *** (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, May 3, 20:14:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.