But a legitimate reason for keeping him over Naismith nonetheless

I think the *concern* is really that because Naismith cost a few quid and was a marquee signing, we'll continue to feel obliged to play him even though he is clearly dogs**t.

Hopefully he will come good but if not, would like to think he isn't given too long to mooch about and get paid from the bench.

Posted By: CauldRon on May 2nd 2016 at 08:52:58

Message Thread

Do we expect Naismith to be playing in a Norwich shirt season? (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 2, 04:34:20
- Who cares? The guy is an overpaid donkey! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, May 2, 12:49:33
- Keeping hold of Howson seems more important (NCFC) - revsimon, May 2, 12:40:33
  - Hoping we can hold on to Howson. Depends on asking price for Bamford. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, May 2, 12:54:33
- Yes (NCFC) - Old Man, May 2, 11:14:25
  - I think I read he has a buy out clause if relegated but.... (NCFC) - usacanary, May 2, 12:23:05
    - Or Rangers (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, May 2, 13:36:05
    - Can imagine Burnley going for him (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, May 2, 12:55:57
  - Potentially a great player for us next season. Definite keep if we can. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, May 2, 11:57:35
- If we go down then IMO he would be a very good player in the Championship (NCFC) - strap_on sally, May 2, 08:37:52
  - Rangers fans don't like him after his comments about them being a different club (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, May 2, 13:24:39
- I hope not as it will mean we will off load Vadis. He offers more than Naismith. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, May 2, 08:20:14
  - Based on what evidence? (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 2, 08:28:13
    - I'd base it on the times Vadis has played (NCFC) - CauldRon, May 2, 08:47:09
      - Must have missed it. (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 2, 08:50:08
        
        But a legitimate reason for keeping him over Naismith nonetheless (NCFC) - CauldRon, May 2, 08:52:58
        
        He isn't dogshite though, he's been dissapointing (NCFC) - strap_on sally, May 2, 09:09:10
        
        Yep, exactly this. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, May 2, 09:50:28
        
        from memory Vadis had one good 20 mins spell as a sub (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 2, 09:49:36
        
        The few times I've seen him have been more so (NCFC) - CauldRon, May 2, 10:45:32
        
        exactly this (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 2, 10:35:14
- Yes will make too much of a loss otherwise... (NCFC) - loz, May 2, 06:52:41
  - I think he'll come good (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, May 2, 07:24:34
    - Maybe championship will be his level (n/m) (NCFC) - bullsch, May 2, 07:30:27
      - Well he's proven himself at prem level... (NCFC) - loz, May 2, 07:48:04
        
        Lame excuses!! He looked the Buisness against Liverpool (NCFC) - hoolahan, May 2, 08:09:45
        
        He's not been fit, let alone remotely match fit since he came to us. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, May 2, 08:58:39
- No. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, May 2, 06:46:48
- Yes, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, May 2, 05:11:25
  - would he get in the side? he hasn't got Wes' creativity, we've never even remotely (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 2, 06:25:14
    - At the moment it's hard to say if he'll get in the side next season, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, May 2, 07:29:49
      - Well, i can't see us getting more than 5 points max.that's being optimistic. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 2, 08:24:01
        
        But none of us have any idea what's going to happen in the remaining games. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, May 2, 08:53:41
        
        Yeah, you're right tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 2, 09:06:48
    - We'll be more likely to play with two front men next season (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 2, 07:10:53

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.