Think I got a bit confused there

What I meant to say was the 5.5 million that is left after Crewe and Ashton had taken their cut should surely all be avaliable for new players. The money from the parachute payments that was used for the original transfer was supposedly the transfer budget that we should have had for this year so it would have been spent on players anyway. I think that just about makes sense- doesn't it.

Posted By: kevdee on January 26th 2006 at 09:06:27

Message Thread

According to Chris Lakey on edp 24 (NCFC) - kevdee, Jan 26, 08:18:11
- well no (NCFC) - megson, Jan 26, 08:50:11
- We buy for ?3m, sell for ?7m (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 26, 08:49:27
  - Think I got a bit confused there (NCFC) - kevdee, Jan 26, 09:06:27
  - I would spend the money on 2 executive beach huts at Cromer (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 26, 08:58:12
    - you can rent beach huts at Luton..... (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 26, 16:50:13
- don't forget who our manager is (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 26, 08:26:29
  - If he signs players like Jerome (NCFC) - kevdee, Jan 26, 08:28:47
    - I'll take that as a no then (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 26, 08:31:37
    - Include Lisbie & Johannsson In That List (n/m) (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 26, 08:31:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.