Tend to agree with him,

There's a couple of goals that have been blamed on him when really it's the responsibility of whoever is designated to cover Pinto if he gets forward. There are times he will get caught forward, as could happen with any wing back style defender. If we're going to play him, knowing he will get forward then someone has to cover him.

Posted By: I Am Hoot on March 12th 2016 at 11:32:31

Message Thread

Robust defence of Pinto from AN... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 12, 11:26:54
- Then drops him (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 11:50:44
  - Only way he can accommodate Martin (undrppable ffs) (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 12, 11:55:21
    - To be fair Martin has been ok lately (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Mar 12, 11:59:42
      - Really?? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 12, 12:07:55
        
        I think he has. Opinions, innit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 12, 12:10:44
        
        Yep all about opinions... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 12, 12:14:45
- Tend to agree with him, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Mar 12, 11:32:31
  - Which means the lads aren't being trained properly to cover (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 11:37:17
    - Yes, either that or they're just not following the instructions. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Mar 12, 11:38:50
      - For simple stuff like that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 11:44:38
- Has he mentioned Naismith? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 12, 11:28:39
  - Late fitness test I think (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 12, 11:29:49
- Stupid signing! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Mar 12, 11:27:38

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.