Looked much better after going to four at the back

players seemed to know their roles more and we had a better presence in midfield.

Hopefully three at the back will be consigned to history. Its just a gimmick which doesn't work if teams can prepare properly against it.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on March 1st 2016 at 21:42:32

Message Thread

Looked much better after going to four at the back (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 1, 21:42:32
- More bollox (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 1, 21:48:32
  - I'll address this when I've walked home. But yes, we did (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 1, 21:55:20
  - you think we played better tonight with three at the back? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 1, 21:50:43
- Utterly disagree, looked better because Chelsea were in (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 1, 21:45:14
  - partly that, but more so because we got rid of an unncessary defender and put on a striker (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 1, 21:46:51
    - Back three only gave up one real goal (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Mar 1, 21:50:32
      - they conceded two in 60 minutes and several other clear chances (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 1, 21:51:49
        
        In your opinion ! (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 1, 22:11:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.