Two good chances?

I can remember the header but not the other one?

Posted By: Kangol Canary on February 28th 2016 at 08:26:03

Message Thread

Seen a few people saying Redderz had a good game, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 28, 06:35:19
- will start playing well now just to get move in summer (NCFC) - yellows2011, Feb 28, 09:37:46
  - Mick out! (n/m) (NCFC) - yellowman, Feb 28, 10:04:28
  - Trolltastic (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Feb 28, 09:39:33
- He worked hard enough in the 1St half. The whole team (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 28, 08:42:48
  - *BOTH going forward and in helping defensively* (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 28, 08:45:48
- I thought he still looked dangerous first half (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Feb 28, 08:28:03
- Time to stick with this system, I would have Bamford up front (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Feb 28, 08:00:40
  - Got to be worth a go up there (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Feb 28, 09:40:37
  - I think Bamford has been a wasted loan. (NCFC) - berstreetsfinest, Feb 28, 09:02:02
  - Two good chances? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Feb 28, 08:26:03
    - What about the one where Schemical came off his line (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 28, 09:13:43
    - Ball got stuck under his feet for the other one (first half, right side of goal). (n/m) (NCFC) - dennis moore, Feb 28, 08:36:39
  - I'd like to see more of Bamford but I think he would end up isolated in that setup, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 28, 08:24:22
- It was obvious after Pinto's first game that wingbacks were the way to go. Brady is (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 28, 06:51:20
  - 4 5 1 is fucking boring, finally the colney wingbacks to mix it up! (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 28, 07:52:30
  - I think playing away against good sides it's a good formation, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Feb 28, 07:09:48

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.