Didn't see a nick, though might have been
and would only have been an OG if he had played it into the goal. There are other possibilties, like not playing it into the goal.
Posted By: duke of york on February 27th 2016 at 17:11:31
Message Thread
- Bennett switched off for the goal? (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Feb 27, 17:00:35
- Think it was a communication issue (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 27, 17:04:50
- No, left on his own against Ulloa and Vardy (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:04:26
- Still went across his toes. Got to play it (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 17:05:55
- would have been an og and it was diverted ever so slighlty by vardy i believe (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 27, 17:09:25
- Didn't see a nick, though might have been (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 17:11:31
- pretty hard though at that speed and so low (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 27, 17:24:31
- Didn't see a nick, though might have been (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 17:11:31
- would have been an og and it was diverted ever so slighlty by vardy i believe (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 27, 17:09:25
- Still went across his toes. Got to play it (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 17:05:55
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.