One piece of shocking defending in 89 minutes and that's that
Would have helped if we'd actually tried to score in the second half. Had zero goal threat, but Neil seemed happy to see it out at 0-0.
Jerome was knackered, Naismith offered little going forward, and we seemed happy to just pass it around the egde of the box, without ever having anyone actually in the box.
Should have made subs after about 65/70 minutes.
Posted By: duke of york on February 27th 2016 at 16:56:05
Message Thread
- One piece of shocking defending in 89 minutes and that's that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 16:56:05
- wouldn't say that, it was a very good ball in (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:02:34
- Fuck off with your shocking bullshit. Great peformance, unlucky. (n/m) (NCFC) - shortfatb, Feb 27, 17:01:50
- Two players drawn to Mahrez, leaving Albrighton (I think) on the right (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 27, 17:04:54
- Disagree entirely (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Feb 27, 17:00:11
- Wouldnt say shocking dangerous ball in to box that snuck through (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Feb 27, 16:59:54
- what was shocking? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 27, 16:58:01
- The defending. He says it in the tital of the post. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 27, 17:00:16
- which bit was shocking? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 27, 17:05:12
- The defending. He says it in the tital of the post. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Feb 27, 17:00:16
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Lager top, Feb 27, 16:57:13
- That's what was disappointing. At 0-0 we could've gone for the win or first goal at least (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 27, 16:57:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.