Squad, not necessarily starting 11 - Wrath of the Barclay

Squad, not necessarily starting 11

But clear(ish) of the distractions that have been keeping him out. DR's turn now.

Posted By: Tressells Broadbrush on February 26th 2016 at 20:29:53

Message Thread

Aaarrgh! Wrong place again. Astounding Wes stats (apologies etc.) (NCFC) - dennis moore, Feb 26, 19:17:44
- Midweek game coming up so he will no doubt be dropped for one of the next two (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 26, 19:46:43
  - T'other way round. Possibly (NCFC) - Tressells Broadbrush, Feb 26, 19:58:44
    - Squad, not necessarily starting 11 (NCFC) - Tressells Broadbrush, Feb 26, 20:29:53
      - If Wes is not in the squad tomorrow (and not injured) Alex Neil is an imbecile (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 26, 21:29:33
      - Partner (n/m) (NCFC) - Tressells Broadbrush, Feb 26, 20:40:56
      - Rudd having a baby? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Feb 26, 20:34:33
    - Go RyBen. (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Feb 26, 20:01:37
  - I'd play Wes vs Leicester, Naismith in the hole vs Chelsea (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 26, 19:48:25
    - Wes should play both. Wes, Naismith and A N Other behind the striker (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 26, 19:49:26
      - 4 all-out attacking players? No midfield aganst Leicester (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 26, 21:03:30
        
        No they won't. Two holding midfielders behind (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 26, 21:28:01
        
        mm given that AN has supposedly said we won't play 2 DMs again (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 26, 21:31:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.