Whole thing is a little strange

Tony Hall seems to be implying he was sacked because his evidence to the investigation was not as full as one would expect. In essence it seems to be a case of others saying he was interviewed about it 45 years ago whilst he has denied being interviewed in the manner the report suggested happened. Hardly seems the basis to sack someone.

He's certainly not been proven to have done anything illegal with the girl who made allegations all those years ago yet that is now mud that will stick because of this sacking.

Posted By: Jim on February 25th 2016 at 13:28:14


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in