If we are...
Posted By: SimonOTBC on February 6th 2016 at 12:31:54
Message Thread
- I'm thinking something like this today (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 6, 12:11:22
- Exactly this minus Pinto (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:33:52
- Agree with U about Pinto (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:34:28
- Mbokani will absolutely boss the Villa defence if he starts today (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:33:50
- Bamford for me (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:38:40
- Both will play at some stage. I'd start with Mbokani, bring on a fresh Bamford on 60 mins (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:43:51
- Me too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:39:23
- Him Naismith and Wes in combo should be a real handful (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:39:48
- Bamford a clever player, I think his link up with Wes and Naismith would get us goals. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:43:47
- We'll see today, and it's great to have both options. But I think you underestimate Mbokani. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 13:17:39
- Agreed. Mbokani for games where we need an outlet to hoof to (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 13:02:11
- Bamford a clever player, I think his link up with Wes and Naismith would get us goals. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:43:47
- Him Naismith and Wes in combo should be a real handful (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:39:48
- We need a measure of both (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:37:11
- I think they're more susceptible to movement than physicality (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:36:22
- We need a measure of both (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:37:59
- Bamford for me (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:38:40
- Similar from me . . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Feb 6, 12:30:17
- Bamford done the prezzer nailed on start (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 6, 12:33:27
- Dorrans is unavailable (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:30:50
- Bennett for Bassong too (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 6, 12:15:40
- Can't see a single reason why Pinto would keep his place. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:35:52
- I thought the same about Brady before we played Liverpool (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 6, 12:37:43
- Pinto and Brady would be brilliant wingbacks, probably too late this season to change but (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:41:56
- I thought the same about Brady before we played Liverpool (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 6, 12:37:43
- I can't understand why we'd pick pinto today (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:19:45
- Given villa's lack of quality (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 6, 12:23:22
- Perhaps, but gil and Traore are their most dangerous players and operate in his area (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:27:39
- Given villa's lack of quality (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 6, 12:23:22
- Can't see a single reason why Pinto would keep his place. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:35:52
- Martin in for pinto for me (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:13:10
- I think this is the big decision, and it's a v close call. (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:26:25
- If we're not playing Wes, bamford and Naismith, we need some solidity on defence (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:31:44
- If we are... (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:31:54
- If we're not playing Wes, bamford and Naismith, we need some solidity on defence (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 6, 12:31:44
- Probably stick with him today, (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 6, 12:14:39
- I think this is the big decision, and it's a v close call. (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 6, 12:26:25
- Exactly this minus Pinto (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 6, 12:33:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.