on Pinto, yes and no
I'm not sure any of our RBs are a better option defensively so I wouldn't necessarily drop him.
But he's not the solid RB that we needed right now. He may yet turn out to be an excellent purchase and player, but it seems like the wrong sort of purchase for the back end of a relgation dogfight.
Posted By: CWC on February 3rd 2016 at 20:19:16
Message Thread
- Ivo Pinto (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:49:25
- I think we should go back to the team v Sunderland away (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 3, 19:55:59
- We were good in that game (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 3, 19:58:19
- yes, now is not the time to bed him in (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 3, 19:52:36
- I'm not certain (NCFC) - camcan, Feb 3, 19:52:05
- Of course he wasn't responsible for all the goals (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:56:41
- Yeah I was there (NCFC) - camcan, Feb 3, 20:15:24
- He's not being singled out (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 20:18:45
- Yeah I was there (NCFC) - camcan, Feb 3, 20:15:24
- you need to ask that question? (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 3, 19:55:17
- Me no understand (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:57:03
- Actually you seem to agree (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:59:47
- on Pinto, yes and no (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 3, 20:19:16
- Agreed - I'd just rather have a more defensive minded RB right now (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 20:22:47
- on Pinto, yes and no (NCFC) - CWC, Feb 3, 20:19:16
- Actually you seem to agree (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:59:47
- Me no understand (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:57:03
- Of course he wasn't responsible for all the goals (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 3, 19:56:41
- I think we should go back to the team v Sunderland away (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 3, 19:55:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.