How have we succeeded with "up to 3.5" if spurs failed with 7?
This is how McNally earns his bonus, I'm guessing.
Posted By: Old Man on February 2nd 2016 at 00:44:39
Message Thread
- Someone on the CCFC board said Spurs had a 7m bid rejected (NCFC) - Kev, Feb 2, 00:41:06
- Nursey says deal worth up to ?3.5 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:42:50
- How have we succeeded with "up to 3.5" if spurs failed with 7? (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 2, 00:44:39
- You'd assume that was just paper talk (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:46:16
- Looks like 7 million was the apparent asking price (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:49:41
- Maybe Spurs didn't bid (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 00:45:19
- You'd assume that was just paper talk (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:46:16
- Million (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:43:01
- How have we succeeded with "up to 3.5" if spurs failed with 7? (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 2, 00:44:39
- Nursey says deal worth up to ?3.5 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 00:42:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.