It's interesting. Probably why McNally is the CEO and I'm
just an idiot on the internet. I would have done it exactly the opposite way. Go for Diouf on loan because he's more likely to make an instant impact seeing as he's actually played and scored a bit this year in the league; and
looked to buy Bamford because he's more of a long term play. Chelsea still could have had first refusal even selling him to us. What do I know.
Posted By: SeattleSounders on February 1st 2016 at 18:40:47
Message Thread
- Leicester have been offered Diouf by the looks of it... (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Feb 1, 17:52:17
- Cmon McNally, get in the game with Diouf, an actual striker (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 1, 18:20:46
- Would love him here (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Feb 1, 18:23:07
- It's interesting. Probably why McNally is the CEO and I'm (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 1, 18:40:47
- Would love him here (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Feb 1, 18:23:07
- We don't need him, we need more CBs and LBs (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 1, 18:20:27
- Cmon McNally, get in the game with Diouf, an actual striker (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 1, 18:20:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.