It's a tough call - personally would say no
Rudd has done ok, quite well even.
He isn't yet the keeper ruddy *was* but the ruddy we've had the last 18 months wasn't either.
If Being dropped has got ruddy to recover his form it might work but if it hast you've probably destroyed the confidence of your only option.....
Rudd should probably get a few more games at least to prove himself after all he's had 1 bad (ish) game.:...and ruddy had loads...../
Posted By: matgore on January 31st 2016 at 18:34:22
Message Thread
- Ruddy to return on Tuesday? (NCFC) - Windowlicker1, Jan 31, 18:30:32
- I dunno, wonder if his presence might organise the back 4 a bit better? (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Jan 31, 19:29:56
- Please god no. Ruddy was dropped for mistakes. Rudd (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 31, 19:05:19
- It's a tough call - personally would say no (NCFC) - matgore, Jan 31, 18:34:22
- Agree with this (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 31, 19:01:04
- nailed it ^^^^ (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 18:58:11
- not tough call. Rudd has already proved himself much much better than Ruddy (NCFC) - pab, Jan 31, 18:40:46
- Agreed. Ruddy was always flawed by being unwilling to come off his line (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 31, 19:03:33
- Vvvvmt (n/m) (NCFC) - CauldRon, Jan 31, 19:00:26
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 18:43:26
- rudd has already p (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Jan 31, 18:37:41
- This isn't ITK is it? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 18:31:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.