and we kept two with him very much in the team
not that I think he's good enough at CB. At RB there's more of a debate
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on January 23rd 2016 at 17:24:29
Message Thread
- Looks like it's between us, Bmouth, Swans and Newcastle, possible WBA (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 23, 17:01:00
- Nothing has really changed (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 23, 17:27:42
- WBA will be okay (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 23, 17:04:28
- They'll be safe and unbearably tedious every year under Pulis (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 23, 17:14:32
- but collecting the big bucks in the meantime (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 23, 17:17:32
- They'll be safe and unbearably tedious every year under Pulis (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 23, 17:14:32
- If we can't get anything out of a game when we score 4 (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 23, 17:03:32
- We lost 5-4 at home in 94 and finished 12th (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 23, 17:07:08
- Agree BUT... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 23, 17:05:12
- Russell Martin there's the answer to why were shit at CB (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 23, 17:19:48
- Well that surely is a positive (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 23, 18:23:51
- and we kept two with him very much in the team (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 23, 17:24:29
- Not when he's at CB (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 23, 17:32:24
- Russell Martin there's the answer to why were shit at CB (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 23, 17:19:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.