I thought AN set the team up well. Posts on here saying it was an open midfield, yet

we largely dominated midfield possession. The set-up was designed to exploit Liverpool's fragility, and it did it well. We conceded a real sickener, but then scored three. And then they scored three. We scored four goals and lost by the odd goal, to a high-value team. We could easily have won by the odd goal. I even understand the selection of Martin over Bennett. Can't understand why people can't see positives.

Posted By: Higher Wrather on January 23rd 2016 at 15:56:36

Message Thread

I thought AN set the team up well. Posts on here saying it was an open midfield, yet (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 23, 15:56:36
- A few on here also seem to overlook the lack of available CDM's today (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 23, 16:02:40
- I'm curious. Why select Martin over Bennett? (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 23, 15:58:50
  - Because Martin is more skilful (it's relative, I know), and Liverpool play a pressing game (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 23, 16:02:53
  - AN thinks RM is better with the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 23, 16:01:03
- But you don't change it at 3-1??... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 23, 15:57:44
  - Tbf there was a minute between our third and their second (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 23, 16:00:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.