In terms of a years wage, that's 4.6m
Posted By: pants on January 20th 2016 at 23:49:57
Message Thread
- Hooper deal is ?3m and on 32k per week at Wednesday. (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 20, 22:29:47
- In terms of a years wage, that's 4.6m (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 20, 23:49:57
- 3M is not too bad at all. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 22:41:48
- fairly cheap I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 20, 22:45:04
- I think a 2m loss over what 2 years? Isn't so bad in the circumstances. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 23:27:33
- Scored some important goals to get us into the promotion mix last season... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jan 20, 23:33:49
- Definitely given his wages (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 20, 23:28:22
- Yep, deffo (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 23:29:04
- He's not done much to suggest he's worth that since he signed (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 20, 22:50:37
- Yeah, he's a poacher and good at it too, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 23:28:38
- he'd be great if they got rid of the offside law (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 20, 22:54:03
- I think a 2m loss over what 2 years? Isn't so bad in the circumstances. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 23:27:33
- fairly cheap I think (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 20, 22:45:04
- I'd take ?3m (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 20, 22:40:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.