the defence have looked pretty decent in recent weeks

with two defensive midfielders in front of them. PLaying with just one was more of an issue than the defences lack of athleticism (which is nonsense).

Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 16th 2016 at 17:03:20

Message Thread

The problems today stemmed from the selection, not transfer activity (NCFC) - King, Jan 16, 16:56:52
- Excepting Brady none of today's back four is athletic enough (NCFC) - Caramac, Jan 16, 17:00:39
  - Seems Brady is above criticism. Very poor in the last two games (n/m) (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Jan 16, 17:04:35
    - agree that he's been slighlty off form for a while now (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 17:09:29
    - agreed, seemed a bit lacklustre. Acceptable though since he's been excellent (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 16, 17:09:15
  - I think Bennett has the attributes to be a solid CB (NCFC) - King, Jan 16, 17:03:34
  - the defence have looked pretty decent in recent weeks (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 17:03:20
- So don't understand why it's not Ollson & Brady on the left (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 16, 16:59:23
  - Agreed (NCFC) - King, Jan 16, 17:01:06
  - Quite agree -no idea wat Olsson has done wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Jan 16, 17:01:04
    - AN likes the brady-jarvis combo (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 16, 17:05:34
    - He played well for a run then was dropped after one iffy game. Harsh. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 16, 17:02:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.