Sorry Ken but that was a yellow. It wasn't viscious and as

I said, wasn't high. Ref reacted to the overreaction of players and bench. However, i agree that he was a total pillock.

Posted By: Chopper on January 13th 2016 at 20:33:55

Message Thread

GON was an absolute idiot but it wasn't a sending off!! (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 13, 20:25:01
- A Trevor Hockey tackle (n/m) (NCFC) - White Van Man, Jan 13, 20:39:02
- Agree. He went from soft to nazi, just because it was at their bench (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 13, 20:28:53
  - Totally inconsistent. Shit ref! (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Jan 13, 20:29:05
- It was a red but it wasn't as dangerous as people are making out. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 13, 20:28:40
- Agreed, apart from the sliding in from behind scissor action...lol (n/m) (NCFC) - moritz, Jan 13, 20:28:39
- What the hell? Stevie Wonder would have red carded him. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 13, 20:28:03
- Two footed from behind (NCFC) - bullsch, Jan 13, 20:27:47
- Cant agree i'm afraid, clear red card, thoroughly deserved. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Jan 13, 20:27:46
- It was a straight red, you cannot jump (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 13, 20:26:47
- 'Course it's a sending off. Two footed, scissors him at speed from behind (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Jan 13, 20:26:42
- It was a sending off i'm afraid (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Jan 13, 20:26:42
  - When you factor in bonus and other benefits (n/m) (NCFC) - the Tilt Man, Apr 1, 19:37:29
- You're joking. You wont see a clearer red all season (n/m) (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Jan 13, 20:26:36
- Behave. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Jan 13, 20:26:15
- Maybe in 1978 (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 13, 20:25:26
  - With a username 'Chopper' I think this poster may of had a few Red's in Sunday League! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, Jan 13, 20:28:16
    - Sorry Ken but that was a yellow. It wasn't viscious and as (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 13, 20:33:55
      - Maybe in Championship but in Prem they can't get away with it (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, Jan 13, 20:40:42
      - Not vicious or high, but against the rules and a red (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 13, 20:37:36
        
        Eh? So anything against the rules is a red? What makes that (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 13, 20:45:04
        
        No. But according to the rules that is a red (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 13, 20:53:09
        
        Explain please. That's a ridiculous statement because (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 13, 20:55:19
        
        Seriously? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 13, 21:42:32
        
        Well if I'm being so daft answer the question (NCFC) - Chopper, Jan 13, 21:51:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.